What colour is a thief? Which racial society does criminality define as its material? I don't want to answer that, but your answer points at someone of my own complexion: what a shame. And but then again, which race doesn't harbour criminal elements within it?
The dark hue complexion is synonymous with everything that is wrong, not good, not valuable and not pure. If there be a report of criminality in an entity, put your ear to the corridor wall and hear what they murmur; the name of a black person will be echoing through and through. This happens because by virtue of birth, a black person is marked as that, a criminal who'll work hard to prove his uncriminality the whole of his life.
A light skin is never seen for what it is; a pretender, a separatist, a manipulative liar and a criminal. Most of those who've been in the daily lives of white people will tell how they too steal and lie. Just that they never invest in exposing those of their own. This is because black is a symbol of poverty, low class working, self hate, and wannabe trivias, as such will be procured to sing their praises and peddle the right message about them to line his pockets and fight their battles on and off field. Take a look at how business leaders use politicians to further their agendas in Africa.
In corporate world the majority of profits are realized through ways that are tailored to rob off someone. The very fancy lexicon of crimes we call today are from their doing because they committed them first. We should pause and revisit the business models, remuneration package structures, beneficiation systems and employment criteria, and you'll see how lesser nepotistic blacks are in comparison to the Easterners and Westerners.
Miseducation is still a tool that to date is a weapon of racial de-profiling, information dilution, economic seclusion, and serial injustices. A white executive can be appointed as an incumbent director based on his surname and experience if having any, but a black one should be on qualifications, experience, resourcefulness and the level of where they are by then. A white executive borrows from the company coffers sans a resolutive consent and approval from the board and is called a bonus or emergency fund, but should a black executive do the same is charged with misappropriation of funds. Same time a black journalist be hyping up the headline so the black sole can read, watch and hear about the exposed thief that should be lambasted, citing quotes from a bought black politician. When a black executive wronged, they get dealt with via criminal law system, but when it's a white executive, corporate law gets applied.
Graft is double standard, and why don't we point that out? We should be taught from school what it is for how it is. It is sadly our reality of the era what gets spread as that, trust never a black executive for they are thieves and rather others as they are trustworthy guardians. This done with the aiding of some black hangers-on who think they will be seen and treated as better if they come with self-denoting policies during formulation.
But truth is, many forms of cover-up are not the makings of a black person but a white one, and almost all graft exposure mechanisms designed in mind with the black one to size him. White-collar crime is rife in corporate set up and none is saying anything about it because of not wanting to forego kickbacks and other benefits.
In conclusion: I never knew about blind trusts, fronting, gap profiteering, ring-fencing, yajurvedas, etc, until I set my foot into the corporate world. I was taught to be always observant and what my obsession with observing them showed me was how crooked they were and how none cared to say a thing. The very crimes are still committed to this day.
Where there's corruption, there's the giving out and the receiving end, and that knows no colour. This made possible by us desiring higher positions in life, glorified status, envied lifestyles, and being cool by association. Our shortcut tendencies landed us in hot waters with crossed fingers burnt.
To reverse the economic exclusion of past, the new economic occult is graft mining, which levels the playing field whilst simultaneously leaving us untainted our chromatic purity we so much fight for. Done right, a generational pipeline of wealth that cloys through selective beneficiation, reserve shares, assay-marked jument enterprises, and new yajur-vedas. Graft mining is a pattern of network that is strategized over time not overnight, that doesn't fit just about anyone but a certain group, unlike with crypto mining in that with this one you need a certain level of knowledge and spotlessness (screening) to be in. If you're to go anywhere with it, should observe how those who came in before you are doing it and follow suit. Don't revolutionize that which doesn't necessitate such. The bottom line is, graft is everywhere and knows no colour...
No comments:
Post a Comment