[Be associable]

The neutrality stance in truth an old new game that has been played for long and having stood the test of time, and that but still a trick found in the world of the young today. To how things change, true the same way they stay, to those long been there in it. Being paused in state a new winner stunt that's deployed in biznes and politics these days, to frustrate the staunch oppo affiliates and loyalists, but how effective it is still a quotient clave to slot wisdom in.

And, with weakness and risk of loss associated with choosing sides or allegiance, neutrality stance remains to date the power position for some. It works not in all cases, but a safe position to take at times. Get it not wrong though, you at the end will be forced to make a choice on which side you are. You can't stay on the touch line forever, but have the weight than those who chose earlier in. Being a kingmaker is basically about that if well calculated. It often scream indicisive if kept position for too long, so, avoid that.

Nothing is as attractive as a person who wields their draw card but not revealing their number. You can't say anything interesting when already your side of the coin is open flipped. You can be listened to only if you're on the side that's dominant. In corporatolics it's tough, you can't afford to be seen as a wimp. You constantly get faced up with choice making decisions and you have to do so firmly, but then, how you protect your decisions up to you as one thing for sure is you have to.

In conclusion: is it important to stay neutral? Is it possible to stay neutral and powerful? If the answer to both is yes, then might as well be. What I can safely say is that apply timing in how you play your cards coz levels of the game differ, and tactics aren't going to apply same. It's not a true affirmation that some have it all in one basket and figured it out. There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Life has its way of making you win and lose, but in the end lessons out are worthwhile. In short, have a reason for your stance instead of doing it just becoz someone did it. Be careful with your choices. It may yes be cool being mysterious but not so cool when sidelined for not being able to be associable...dp

by KgeleLeso

©ddwebbtel publishing.2K23

[Sometimes be a realist]

The most realistic draw out lesson out of the world of biznes is that it's a game of authority, influence and power, and if you aren't successful in getting that, are in for a hell of a shock ride to losshood. A powerful biznes coach not so long ago told me that biznes is a scam that depends on which side of the game planners' agenda you're on, on which day did you get in, by whom you are introduced into it and lastly, in it as what. Said success in today's biznes is about your association to some insider's name and face, hard work to create luck, and ability to be resourceful. It stuck with me for the most part of this year, and in all essence found it to be so true. If you take care to notice, you'll see.

In biznes there're market makers, opportunity creators and controllers of rewards and gains, a collage of bricoleurs whom are The Original Capitalists or TOCs. TOCs are the world order regulators. Whom they are remains to date a spirited date with speculation. So, for most of us, we are in the lowest tier of economy control, and cannot be reached for comment on TOCs and as such will focus on our shoe sizes which are the reality of our lives. Much as it's now gotten to realization that biznes is a scam, what we ought to do is seek ways on how to suit the design of the plan coz it's no secret that all we do today is fight to be a fit in the plan of the world order.

What to do in order to get success out of the effort you're busy with is rescam others. If you aren't ready to get into the office through its door, be ready to be its painter. Each step of your way to success you're faced with gatekeepers whom you have to con so as to get to the door keepers, elevators and masters. You can't play the same trick twice, so, one of the skills to success that you need to master is acting. Putting on the mask for each character is of utmost importance and once passed those can get access to your dream. Truth is, you'll never reach your peak sans a visit of influence into your path, it's real as that, water that.

The reality of barriers is thick, you may have those plans and strategies for your market entry but honestly are to face an uphill of red tape. To make it, you have to align with any player from inside, unless you want to remain a small player. Learn to be adaptive and your success will be guaranteed.

In conclusion: it doesn't matter where you are from, it's same story. Your only chance of getting in early is adherence to guidelines from the gatekeepers. If you be realistic about all those things you'll be on track to the desired outcome of your vision. Trust me, you may be seasoned in your own right but in the master's standards be not, so, be patient and bide your time...dp

by KgeleLeso

©ddwebbtel publishing.2K23

[Asensual objectification]

"When I opened my eyes you were the first object I saw" and giggles roamed the room amok. This was said by a male friend and colleague of mine to a jolly fellow female colleague. The statement on its own, however innocent as it may have been uttered, is wrong. You can't say such a thing to another person, especially in this day in that we are puffing sensibility on and off set in terms of addressing sexualism, ease of workspace sharing and sexual harassment.

Objectifying another sole is wrong, and bad is when it comes from the other border of gender. How we see each other and say it out is crucial, it sifts the truest of us as persons before being colleagues that we are. According to a research that I recently read, the issue of ease of workspace sharing doesn't get intensely interrogated as it must be, and surprisingly a fertile feedlot of employee challenges.

Normally we can't do without using the common space provided if we are to carry out work. But, how we relate to one another determines the outcomes of the business being productive or not. If one feels bad about another, it affects the entire TEAM performance, and that alone a scary thought. Ask any colleague what they see first in looking at the other gender and at their same and you'll be amazed by what you're to hear. There're lots of challenges to uncover that're mated to the common space that work is carried out from.

A lot of industrial psychologists and HR personnel will alert you to a host of underlying issues that haunts the workplaces. At most it's the senior colleagues. Those entrusted with the task of overseer are the horn beepers in treating subordinates as their special projects. The issue of asensual objectification might sound innocent but brews into something else if not nipped from the onset as it tends to morph, and once allowed, it won't be easy to stop its snowball form fall from the anchoring towers.

The minute a colleague sees another as an object, it means they are well on their way to knocking for more if allowed. Calling another as an object shouldn't be promoted at all no matter its justification. If poorly handled, those that are resisting advances or hit ups might endure victimization. Abuse of rank is the most troubling aspect in lead of workspace tendency that many subordinates suffer.

In conclusion: any subordinate needs protection from such occurrences as they breed uncalled for eventualities of regret. A woman is a person who like you came to work, a man is also a person who came for their sole productive purpose, and should be viewed and treated alike. You the high ranker, some of your social tendencies might come across as unprofessional, so, do the better you for harmony to prevail in the place of work. Make people enjoy working with you...dp

by KgeleLeso

©ddwebbtel publishing.2K23

[Lead with fun]

All work and no play makes for poor job outcomes and any leader should be knowing that. Depending solely on the type of leader you are, will your team results show; not the job type, not the industry nor definitely not the geo-positioning factor. What any leader should bear in mind is that there's a need for a couple of light moments in the place of work. Nobody has ever delivered good group results constantly sans having a bit of fun now and then. And also, every person wants a leader that is humanly like them.

Winning is a full time decider and losing is an all time reminder that a TEAM needs to perform so as to deliver at all costs. But, for a TEAM to perform optimally they need not only have trade tools, support and a conducive space to ply their trades from, but peaking the list is the best leader to work with. And but then, what defines the best leader? Sadly, can't self pinpoint all the dots to connect to that answer for accuracy, except for the fact that as a leader one must be relations centric, and I remain open to any's direction per that.

Leadership relies on people skills and life experiences before anything work related. To be respected as a person who leads you ought to be respectful and responsible to your respect, be it given or received. Thing is, a leader is first and foremost a person who works with other people, diligently managing their talents, challenges, flaws, expectations, and their beings with a holistic view of what they are afore whom they are. With thusly fronted, surfaces a board of questions to ask. Are you doing that in line with the corporate vision or yours? Are you applying guidelines by the company policy or of your own principles? Where do you draw the line on your reasonability and mannerability? Mind your important self that you are at work, no matter your position occupancy, as long as you are a leader you have to just tow the line.

A good leader, I figured; is a friend, a confidant, a representative, a role model and a figure of authority, an omnia paratus sole with no limit to placement. And, as one, you should regularly schedule self inspections on how you fare against the backdrop of the results you keep producing. Provision of fun is one of the prime outcomes laced factors that is repeatedly a wretched thoughtmanship by choice. You lead people not positions, and those people need breaks from the seriousness of the course worked on. Provide activities that recondition their mindsets, rekindle their love for their work, so as to shift how they connect with their work for the best outcomes which will make you look good in your position.

In conclusion: you are the reflection of what you manage as a leader, and any good or bad an outcome a perception of how we view you in charge. A leader that laughs less is a leader in revenue loss, whilst a leader that excites turns out good margins. The secret to leadership is interpersonal skills, situational analyses, teamliness, a pleasanter of being had around. There's no use dealing with a grumpy bunch than leading a bubbly bunch. Work your person from your friendships to your partnerships. You win first through self before the nexts, so, have fun doing that and you'll see how fun it is to lead...dp

by KgeleLeso

©ddwebbtel publishing.2K23

[Forgiveness]

Is forgiving good? Let's ask ourselves this frankly. Maybe after answering oneself you'll start questioning your head for its thoughts. Trust me, the amount of teachings we receive on this topic is alarming given the low teachings on how to hurt others and how to avenge selves. We are ever encouraged to respond more than we should react, yet come back still the ones pained, bitter and lost, all in the name of being good people in forgiving.

But, looking at it, one is never sure of which to be during the event of unfolding pain infliction at times, in that it's painful and shaming to be a good person in any given situation of torment than it is on the side of the tormentor. Truth be told, there's no permanent joy in good personing. Good people are viewed as stupid, weaklings, spineless cowards who're never to be trusted in solutions to aggression and its tensions. People tend to listen, admire and adorn the spirit of the ones vengent, than they would with the victim.

In business, none is respected if they aren't decisive, firm for their stance, bold in their statement of character and personality intent, deep in their knowledgeability, self-appointed and in control. So, this telling you that if there's forgiveness, it absolutely gets questioned whom it's from and who is it to, or where it's from and for what? Forgiveness is a dual neutral concept of weakness and benign hegemony. Whenever used, be sure if it's out of issuance or humane place, as it's always situational if you aren't aware.

One thing I love about life and find ever interesting sans tiring my soul, is the role of politics and business in situations. Forget about what those unexposed soles taught you about life, but forgiveness is a vagary just so you know since what comes after it an open cast occurrence. But then, it depends on how you administer your person.

In conclusion: if you comprehend the campaign concept that power is, it's obvious that you won't want to play from the linear side of forgiveness simply because of that. Forgiveness is power laced, and when you give it, should be able to administer it else you sell your bargaining power away. Know the significance of your forgiveness and you'll understand the importance of power. However you look at it, forgiveness is a good thing that only switch course upon situational awareness or not of it. It's an animal farm we're in...dp

by KgeleLeso

©ddwebbtel publishing.2023

[Conclude not on assumption]

"Go into marriage for legacy, and into biznes for dynasty" [1] a big life advise I got. A paganish statement to the eyes of the righteous, I know, for my life lived mostwise as a mammonite. From young, I grew up as a violent sole, and but yesterday got told how apologetic I am as a person; something that my life track disagreed with and pointed rather to humble as a fit. But then again, I asked myself about which side to me did they encounter to inform their grounded opinion to that conclusion, coz true, I am but just humble.

Going into a meet up with just about any encountered target, there seem to always be that expectation of sort on both or more parties involved as they suss each other out. The common challenge is jumping to untreated conclusions on those in the space. While others judge people on attire, others go for reasoning capacity, of which some on demeanor, but are all basing their conclusions on non-concrete assumptions. What I often ask myself is, why can't we cut judgmentality and focus on rather testing the character out for ability to perform and to later gauge the intelligence? If we did that, I believe coexistence wouldn't have been a long winded road.

We have a myriad of participants who failed in partnerships simply because of wrong conclusions or wrong use of words in choice to express their thoughts on situations at hand or people involved too early upon meeting people. Wrong as it may, that is but oddly better in that it has an opportunity to be corrected than the one where the concluding party does so in silence and decide to act without having first treated their thoughts. Also, what's to be erased is that thinking of auld that "first impressions last", 'cause no person has one dimension to them. It's advisable to observe, but do so in recall that every being has an other side that tends to be opposed to the one you know as been presented to you.

When you are in a hunt, you know exactly what you are after, and this applicable same when out courting. Whether in a romantic setup or biz setup, nothing differs. Knowing what you want out of a setting or a particular situation is key. If are a leader and on a mission to build a TEAM, draw your pattern of requirements and go out in follow of those in line with its set program. Compromise not, for tribulations don't come gently, so, you too be firm to what'll bolster you when hardships put the boot on your door. Be humbly honest to your revolution and live better, or live apogetically to your revealed distraction and live your worst life. Carry yourself unapologetically correct to how your pattern requires you to for your success, and let not utterances shape your narrative of self, but rather let them be commanded by your bold showing of knowing the concept of self; it attracts. How will you build your dynasty if you missed an opportunity to work on your legacy?

In conclusion: why is it hard for some people to be themselves to others you'll ask. But, look at how we treat each other the moment we get to know the better of their worst side. It's a scary situation infested with regret, as such be avoiding of making someone feel uncomfortable by you and understand it fully when another is taking their time to be themselves around you. Life gives us experiences differently, and how we either respond or react, a decider to draw from, with endorsement from them. Now, either being in a personal or a biznes front, throw not the net onto the grey denomination unnecessarily. Conclude on what you are told, shown or given, and not on assuming. Life is built and survives on relations, and nothing can be achieved sans that. Be of the mind that whomever you meet up for the first time has the potential to be a bigger part of your life in success or regret, and learn to wait for them to reveal themselves what their intents are for you, and not you conclude on your assumptions of them before you commit to whatever course with them...dp

[1] by KgeleLeso

©ddwebbtel publishing. 2023

[Blood is always thicker]

The feeling of togetherness is one that nothing can beat. To have it as a family, team, alliance, or be it in any other form of relationship that you have with anyone, is a big deal. With unity for any group of people being a wish, society needs to invest more on things that keeps people together and living in harmony.

Looking at the the concept of unity when referring to togetherness, the end result when narrowing it down gives us family. Then now, in family, comes the saying that family is that root of one's being, and that is true. But then, in the same length of play, any group that is related whether by common interest or by blood, takes the shape of family. What is further interesting in it though, is the saying that with one's akin family, blood is thicker than water. Though loosely used, it's the truth that will never go away.

Blood is thicker than water gets to somehow extend to opportunity in some way. In an economy, created opportunity knows the address of the one whom is related to the opportunity bringer and that means the clique or clan first and beyond, but keeping it close nit. We may call it however we please but nepotism, tribalism, ethnicity, all stem from that. In the modern day it has tentacles that goes beyond the call of segregation in that political allegiance, social class, genderism, religious denomination, and many factors of relation, forms the basis of the new blood.

In business, the same happens. How we relate is informed by many grey denominators. And, yes, at the end as individuals going into an economic relationship, we become a family. Partners as a collective will have their own culture that's a sub in the main culture the world of biz has. Though arguable to those not getting it right, but partnership a cult. With the vision and its secret to achieving it binding us, there'll still be a divisive force if in the collective there's an element of akinness.

In conclusion: it should not be that it discourage any closeness but there's always a challenge in anything that has akin relation attached to it. The common challenge is failure to be fair in meting out justness where there's misconduct. Family members will side with one another and fail fairness, and this alone is the reason some organizations never saw the horizon of their planned success, just because blood is thicker than water in every aspect of them, hence some opt out of invites for joining entities that are laced with family bonds...dp

©ddwebbtel publishing. 2023