[How should history remember you?]

"Exposure experienced has no reason to doubt any simpatico or not of comparison bout tons extracted out of the events relived" [1]. I open with this because of what happens to the memories of the recorded moments during the whole course of the eventuation. Once an occurrence retire from your past, a timeline trail it becomes and ultimately in essence taking reside as one's history.

Your mind is a colony of thoughts, having a hold for control of your being. How each thought is conceived and allocated goes to the set content curation from the daily consumption of feed you ascribe to. They say you are what you consume, and this is very true and evident in even what you put your time on. The product you shape of self in become is a choice mastered by not only you but rather in aid of algorithmic tailoring of your content feed trail collected sans your consent yet in subconscious consenting.

The danger of becoming that which you consume is an enigmatic corner none of the exposed are willing to take others to for their experience for safety. It is but understandable given how of late anything you say and found to be against the group thinking is deemed negative or toxic. People are conditioned to shun any new information that is naturally heavy and but accommodating of which is light and insignificant. This is a challenge that is facing a myriad of practitioners in diverse fields.

In conclusion: how you opt to be remembered goes to how you opt to do what you do. What you are isn't always how you'll be remembered last as, and but possible to be designed by you. How you expose self to the vast plethora of life giving's heightens the compound of who and how your last memory becomes in those you encountered. Whether it be by video, audio, still pictures, or personal engagement, it matters how the last moment was in each space you occupied.

People talk about experience they had with you and, almost all the time about your last. With thus telegraphed, a day's exposure of you to someone can be summed up in one, two or three keywords that will describe to the recipient a whole lot more than done initially by you yet be it that they're not wrong about you. As such, control the narrative of you. Control how you are remembered, by patterning your interactions with others always, either as a personal brand or about your corporate brand. Be consumed differently and history will remember you same...dp

[1] by KgeleLeso

2K25. ddwebbtel publishing

[Solidify structure from the onset]

Gimmicks are best left for entertainers not deal makers, a philosophical business coach once said, and it has proved. I was afforded a space on a deal table this past weekend, and this saying made a feature in our negotiation medley. The challenge with the phenomenon that negotiations are, is the role players' mettle in them. Many may differ with this, but is my observation thus far and am not willing to be debating in defense my opinion of.

A simple introduction of role players in the deal has the potential to throw the deal off the rails if wrongly executed I just learned. If we enter the deal as a unit it should be kept at that as that, and no need to be casting nets of divisions by unprecedented answers. One shadow of doubt giving from a presentation can see the counterpart party driven off the deal sans haste. This as a result of something we fail to boldly adhere to, and that is structure. Who is who and not in the unit formation is vital from the onset of any given presentation or engagement.

It's a fundamental key to have positions assigned and responsibilities embodied at all cost when doing business, especially as a team. It helps in clearing off corporate clutter that invites confusion to counterparts and recipients. This is mostly found in merged operations like joint ventures and partnerships. To avoid unnecessary and expensive damage to organizational repute, spend excessive time on role assignments religiously as it can upset an otherwise significant evolution.

In conclusion: one of the strengths of a team is role assignment, and it will remain so for decades to come. When entering a deal any team goes in confidently when set with its structure. They establish a rhythm and evidenced in how they take questions and ask questions, and that an ever impressive front for anyone who is on the hot table. Truth is, one reckless roamer a ruiner of the movement, it's clear as that. Simple things like concise answers and directive questions will save a team a headache of dealing with costly damage controls.

Bemind that 'a lustrum of inefficiency is a repeatable cycle if tweaks are discarded in favor of deficient tolerance to mediocrity' [1]. Normalizing resourceful teamliness should be a priority if we are to be painting set-form murals that display commissioned perception in the cortex of corporate culture and vertexed approach to your entity's chardy unison. But then, all else done correctly at roof level sans solidified foundation a futile render. Strengthen your roling structure from the get-go and your team will be unbeaten on many a hot table...dp

[1] by KgeleLeso
2K25. ddwebbtel publishing