'Perception is best left unturned for what's underneath'[1], if you want peace with how you know something or someone. The same can be sirened about dealing with security and secrecy. Where there's a way someone is seen to be known for who he is, don't tamper with that deflection, or it be something known as is, not to attempt switching narratives if it's against the collective norm unless if it's hazardous to them.
It's an open secret that in today's world, perception is currency and narrative is power. When we speak of influence, we're often referring to the unseen forces that shape our overstanding of the world and ourselves. And, perception, much like influence, is a delicate balance of light and shadow, lest we risk disrupting the fragile equilibrium of our constructed realities. But what happens when the veil is lifted, and the narrative is challenged?
In the realm of individual identity, the stakes are high. We're often cautioned against tampering with someone's carefully crafted narrative, lest we unleash a maelstrom of unintended bruising consequences. But what about when the narrative is rooted in harm or oppression? Do we prioritize the comfort of the individual, or the well-being of the collective?
This tension between individual perception and collective security is a tightrope walk, requiring finesse and nuance. As we navigate the complex web of narratives, we must ask ourselves: whose story are we perpetuating, and at what cost? On the other hand recalling that a secret is a fantasy erection to a blabber, failing to see the leverage they hold through it.
In corporate South Africa, a country with a complex history of social change, failing transformation, huge wealth gap, high unemployment, graduates oversupply, etc. stakes are high. The collective narrative is a powerful force, shaping our identity feel, asserting our belonging, and reaffirming purpose. But what happens when that narrative is challenged or disrupted? How do we reconcile our existing identity with new information or perspectives?
The answer lies in embracing the messiness of human experience. By acknowledging the power of narrative and the fragility of perception, we can begin to build bridges between individual and collective understanding. It's not about switching narratives or erasing histories, but about creating space for multiple truths to coexist. With that on the plate, choosing what get told and what not as the process unfolds, crafters of that narrative forge standing to gain influence for their silence.
In conclusion: it's not about being correct; but about being the right fit for the process. Making others stick to the said truth takes some words, and those cannot be from just about anyone, but that specific one to deliver. It takes a lot of characters debating the "one" who'll execute diligently sans any compromise on its integrity and repute guard. To be that, you have to be comprehending the concept of 'pledge to secrecy'. Now, the question is: are you the material worth risking a corporate secret with?...dp
[1] by KgeleLeso
©2K26. ddwebbtel publishing
